About FFTPartnersMessage BoardFindingsNews

Blue Print Report
Focus Groups
Toolkit Brochure
Lit Review

 

 

 

Even people who were not in close physical proximity to the events demonstrated moderate to high levels of stress.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

For the majority of people, acute post-traumatic symptoms such as anger, disbelief, sadness, anxiety, fear, and sleep disturbance tend to recede or resolve over time.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Although the symptoms of PTSD are readily identifiable by a primary care practitioner, the diagnosis may be missed if exposure to a specific event is not assessed or symptoms are attributed to depression and other anxiety disorders

 

 

 

The September 11, 2001 terrorist attacks and the subsequent mobilization of health care resources to assist victims and their families were unprecedented in this country. Within days of the events, the limited data that were available on survivors and other people living in close proximity, in concert with information regarding previous mass disasters, were used to map out the extent and nature of the psychological impact and need for mental health services. Extrapolating from these data, Herman, Felton & Susser (2002) estimated that over 520,000 people in New York City (NYC) and surrounding counties would experience post-traumatic stress disorder due to some aspect of the attacks, and that more than 129,000 people would seek treatment for PTSD in the coming year.

The anthrax bacteria transmitted through the U.S. postal system shortly after the events of September raised new fears of bioterrorism, contributing further to heightened anxiety. Even people who were not in close physical proximity to the events demonstrated moderate to high levels of stress (Norris, 2001; Schuster et al, 2001; Silver et al., 2002). Reports indicate that people across the country experienced decreased safety, diminished sense of control and well-being, as well as perceived discrimination because of their religion or ethnicity in the U.S. and Canada (Austin et al., 2002; Norris, 2001). The emotional and financial costs of the terrorist events are immeasurable (Jack & Glied, 2002).

Many research and scholarly articles have now been published that assess the impact of past episodes of trauma and disaster on individuals, families, and communities. Most focus on acute stress disorder (ASD) and post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD). For the majority of people, acute post-traumatic symptoms such as anger, disbelief, sadness, anxiety, fear, and sleep disturbance tend to recede or resolve over time. Others, both adults and children, experience PTSD characterized by symptoms of persistent reexperiencing of the event (e.g., recurrent nightmares, intrusive thoughts), avoidance of thoughts or activities that remind them of the event and emotional numbing (e.g., deliberate efforts to forget the event, feelings of emotional detachment), and increased arousal (e.g., hypervigilance, sleep disorders, irritability, difficulty concentrating) that persist for over a month (American Psychiatric Association, Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, 1994).

In addition to this significant and disabling disorder, other problems and related behaviors may develop as a result of traumatic events. Adjustment disorders, major depression, and anxiety disorders may be expressed in indirect ways: complicated bereavement, increased tobacco and substance use, family violence, poor school performance, increased risk-taking, and other behavior problems (Norwood, Ursano & Fullerton, 2002). In fact, even patients with PTSD may not present clinically with psychiatric symptoms as chief complaints: somatic manifestations of stress can be expressed as symptoms of musculoskeletal, gastrointestinal, neurological, gynecological, cardiovascular, or respiratory problems. Symptoms include headaches, back and neck ache, fatigue, indigestion, abdominal pain, nausea and vomiting, as well as paralysis, double vision, and fainting. Unexpected symptoms may also occur as a result of self-medication or missed medications for chronic illnesses (Hassett & Sigal, 2002). Children’s symptoms may be more subtle, or may be acted out as changes in social behavior (Davidhizar & Shearer, 2002; Seideman et al., 1998).

Treatment for these problems is far more likely to be sought in primary care settings than in the offices of mental health professionals. Many somatic symptoms will be misinterpreted as being related to physical illnesses and the stigma regarding mental illness may preclude others from seeking mental health treatment. Primary care settings are an appropriate first point of contact with the health care system for the majority of individuals regardless of their symptoms. However, accurate diagnoses are difficult to make and many primary care providers are not prepared or inclined to deal with mental health issues (Samson et al., 1999; Stephenson, 2001). Although the symptoms of PTSD are readily identifiable by a primary care practitioner, the diagnosis may be missed if exposure to a specific event is not assessed or symptoms are attributed to depression and other anxiety disorders (Yehuda, 2002). Perhaps equally important, physicians and other primary care providers must be sensitive to the vague symptoms that are not clearly pathological but which do point to mental health problems (Hassett & Sigal, 2002; Katon, Sullivan & Walker, 2001). Documenting qualitative and quantitative characteristics of mental health problems resulting from the terrorist attacks will assist in developing useful resources for health care providers and contribute to new models of health care delivery that integrate mental health and primary care in community settings.

Within the first year after the terrorist incidents, a number of data-based studies and scholarly reviews regarding their psychological impact on Americans were published in the scientific literature. The findings of these reports are informed and supported by studies regarding the aftermath disasters and other terrorist events in the U.S. and other countries. They all can inform future research and contribute to resource development.

The purpose of this review is to examine existing literature regarding the psychological impact of the September 11 terrorist events, as well as subsequent terrorist alerts and events, on adults, children and health care providers in relation to:

a) number of people affected and psychological and somatic symptoms during the first six months after the events;

b) trends over time with regard to psychological and somatic symptoms that emerged gradually or changed after the initial six month time frame;

c) factors related to psychological distress and resilience; and

d) natural disasters and terrorist attacks in the U.S. or international settings.